Which of these is NOT an observed cue when assessing for DWI during a stop?

Prompt compliance with signals is not considered an observed cue for assessing driving while intoxicated (DWI) during a stop because it indicates that the driver is responding appropriately to law enforcement instructions. When evaluating a driver for possible impairment, officers look for behaviors that suggest a lack of coordination, delayed reactions, or poor judgment, which are often symptoms of intoxication.

Striking the curb or another object, having a slow response to commands, and making a sudden stop are all cues that can indicate a driver may be under the influence of alcohol or drugs. These behaviors reflect potential impairment, as they demonstrate an inability to operate the vehicle safely and effectively. In contrast, prompt compliance would suggest that the driver is attentive and capable of following directions, which is generally a sign of sobriety.